≈ 28°C Kolkata Tuesday, June 30, 2026
LATEST NEWS
Paraguay Oust Germany After Epic Penalty Shootout | Brazil's Sixth Title Dream Lives On After Japan Triumph | Cricket: Ruturaj Gaikwad’s century helps India A beat Sri Lanka A by 8 runs in tri-series opener in Dambulla. | China's Xi Jinping starts a two-day trip to North Korea, pledging closer ties with Kim Jong Un in his first Pyongyang visit since 2019. | Ashwini Vaishnaw Promises New Era for Kolkata Metro with 60 Modern Trains |

West Bengal Assembly Passes Tough Anti-Goonda Bill

By Editorial Team 👁 6
West Bengal Assembly Passes Tough Anti-Goonda Bill

The Suvendu Adhikari-led BJP government passed two legislations on Monday to curb riots, vandalism and organised crime.

Introduced by Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari in the Assembly, the West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order (Amendment) Bill, 2026 and the West Bengal Public Safety and Control of Anti-Social Activities Bill, 2026, popularly referred to as the “Anti-Goonda Bill”, were passed with a 176- 41 vote division while 20 legislators abstained from voting.

It will authorises the state to detain individuals for up to 12 months without trial to prevent future anti-social actions.

It could be applied to habitual offenders, syndicate leaders, crime financiers, and those participating in illegal mining or wildlife offences.

The bill empowers officials to search, seize, and confiscate assets and documents belonging to individuals linked to anti-social networks.

It also introduces strict provisions to recover financial compensation from vandals for destroying public or private property during violent protests.

The bill also makes provision for formation of an advisory board featuring former judges who will be tasked with reviewing and validating detention cases within three weeks of an arrest.

CM Adhikari insisted that the law is necessary dismantle Bengal's "goonda culture" and control riots, assuring that the bill will not be misused for political vendetta while MLAs of opposition parties opposed the bill, raising concerns over the absence of structural judicial protections and pointing out that it could be weaponised.

Share this article